State v. Brodt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Dakota county charged with the crime of buying and receiving stolen property, tried in the district court for that county before Converse, J., and a jury, and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of buying and receiving stolen property, and appealed from an order denying a new trial. R. does-not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury.
1. After the evidence was all in, the court ordered an afternoon recess. During the recess the trial judge entered the jury room where *433some of the jurors were, and asked the other jurors who were in the corridor of the court house to come in. When all the jurors were present he asked them whether they preferred to have the case submitted to them that evening or the next…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Wilkerson v. EilersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Read v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Crabtree v. HagenbaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Harrison v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- State, by Lord v. WinieckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Marino v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Moran v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948