Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Akron, Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 10, 2019No. 5:18-cv-00635Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) Pamela Harris, CASE NO. 5:18 CV 00635 ) ) Plaintiff, JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) ) City of Akron, ) (Resolves Doc. 29) ) Defendant. ) Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Akron (the “City”). Plaintiff Pamela Harris has opposed the motion, and the City has replied. For the foregoing reasons, the City's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. I. Facts & Procedure The underlying facts that gave rise to this lawsuit are not in dispute. Plaintiff Pamela…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mark Laster v. City of KalamazooCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Clarence Seay, Jr. v. Tennessee Valley Authority Craven CrowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API