Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1982No. 81-174PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The issue presented to us is whether the parents of a normal, healthy child may recover the expenses of raising that child from a doctor who negligently and unsuccessfully performed a vasectomy on the father resulting in the birth of the unexpected child. The trial court held that as a matter of law such expenses were not recoverable and we agree with that judgment.

The question comes to us from a summary judgment granted to the appellees, Dr. Robert L. Kerr and his professional association. The parties narrowed the issue to the trial court, as they have on appeal, by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API