Legal Opinion

United Airlines, Inc. v. Zaman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 30, 2015No. Case No. 14 C 9214PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge

In order to exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, this Court must determine whether the defendant has a “substantial connection” with Illinois, that is, whether the defendant’s contacts connect him to Illinois in a “meaningful way.” See Walden v. Fiore, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1115, 1121, 1125, 188 L.Ed.2d 12 (2014). Based on controlling case law, such contacts must satisfy at least three requirements: (1) the contacts are created by the defendant himself; (2) the contacts are targeted at the forum state (as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Tamburo v. DworkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Strabala v. ZhangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. ConnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. MG Design Associates, Corp. v. CoStar Realty Information, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  5. Café Real Estate LLC v. VSP North America LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API