Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendants appeal and plaintiff cross-appeals from an order that directed discovery in a case arising out of a three-wheel all-terrain vehicle (ATV) accident. Insofar as pertinent to these appeals, the court ruled that plaintiff’s interrogatories and requests to produce were, for the most part, not overbroad, unduly burdensome, or irrelevant; that plaintiff *668was entitled to discover information relating to all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bertocci v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Snyder v. Parke, Davis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Tymko v. K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Moit v. Chesebro-Whitman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Valet v. American Motors Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. Max Co., Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Zamir v. RottensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Harris v. Textron, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Galioto v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API