Legal Opinion

Tymko v. K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff sues to recover the injuries which she allegedly sustained when she used Q-T Quick Tanning Solution, a product manufactured by defendant Plough, Inc., and which she purchased at a store of defendant, K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc. She alleges causes of action in negligence, strict products liability and breach of warranty. As a part of her pretrial preparation, she has had extensive discovery and has had a chemist analyze the product purchased. She now seeks…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. G. D. Searle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Snyder v. Parke, Davis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Cohen v. ResnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Standard & Poor's Corp. v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Bristol v. Town of QueensburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Liebman & Charme v. LanzoniCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
  5. Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API