Legal Opinion

Beary v. Container General Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1989No. 1789PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The instant appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of a Motion by the Defendant-Appellant, Container General Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as “Container”) to mold a verdict. After thorough review, we find no basis for a reversal of the Order of the trial court.

This case has a long and complicated history. In September, 1976, the Plaintiff-Appellee, Jerry M. Beary, was an employee of Additional Defendant-Appellee, Edwards Tank Erection, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Edwards”). In the course of that employment, Beary was involved in the erection of a steel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. National Liberty Life Insurance v. Kling PartnershipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClure v. Deerland Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Kessock, J. v. Conestoga Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Chester Carriers, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Walsh v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. WamsherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API