Legal Opinion
Lafontant v. U-Haul Co. of Florida
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*758In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants U-Haul Co. of Florida, U-Haul Co. of Arizona, and Maurice Marable appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated September 27, 2006, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict finding the plaintiff Guy Lafontant 55% at fault and the defendant Maurice Marable 45% at fault in the happening of the accident, and for judgment as a matter of law, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated November 22, 2006, which, upon a stipulation holding the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Di Ponzio v. RiordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kriz v. SchumNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Soto v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CaballeroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- New v. StachowiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cruver v. Locke Lending, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010