State v. Patton
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LOZIER, Commissioner.
Defendant has appealed from his conviction and two year sentence for grand larceny, As he filed no brief, we examine the matters previously considered part of the record proper and the allegations of error in defendant’s new trial motion. State v. Campbell, Mo.Sup., 262 S.W.2d 5, 6[1]; 42 V.A.M.S. Supreme Court Rule 28.02.
The indictment was sufficient, defendant was personally present throughout the proceedings, the verdict was in proper form, the judgment and sentence were responsive to the verdict, and allocution was granted. Secs. 560.155, 560.160 (all section…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Long v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WoodwardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- McAlevy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Robert Patrick Terrell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.