Legal Opinion

Long v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

This cause was referred by the court to two of its commissioners, Messrs. Hocker and Glen, for investigation who have reported that the judgment ought to be reversed.

Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in July, 1901, in,the Criminal Court of Record of Orange county, upon an information charging the larceny of two cows, the property of William Lancaster. It appears from the evi*136denee that defendant, claiming to own the two cows alleged to have been stolen which were then in a pasture, went out there with one Douglass, as Douglass claimed to sell him the cattle, but as defendant claimed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Talbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. McMullen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Long v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
  5. Holman v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Groover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  2. Escambia County Electric Light & Power Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Bass v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API