Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1953No. 43575PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 S.W.2d 5 (1953)

STATE

v.

CAMPBELL.

No. 43575.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Division No. 1.

November 9, 1953.

Tom A. Shockley, Waynesville, for appellant.

John M. Dalton, Atty. Gen., Grover C. Huston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

LOZIER, Commissioner.

Defendant has appealed from his conviction and two year sentence for grand larceny but has filed no brief. "We, therefore, review the record proper and all valid assignments of error in the motion for new trial." State v. Jonas, Mo.Sup., 260 S.W.2d 3, 4[1].

Defendant's new trial motion contained ten assignments of error. Five challenged the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. State v. HinojosaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. State v. CuezzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. State v. Williams and WannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. State v. DoileSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. BloodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API