People v. Husted
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Clare. (Hart, J.) Complaint for keeping saloon open after nine o’clock at night.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Complaint was made against the defendants and one Charles Peters before a justice of the peace of *625the township of Grant, Clare county, for a violation of the Act of 1881 relative to the sale of spirituous liquors. The complaint was as follows:
“ On the 22d day of July, A. D. 1882,' at the village of Clare, in the county aforesaid, (the said- 22d day of July, A. D. 1882, being a week day,) Burton Husted, Charles Peters and Frank Parish, (he, the said Burton Husted, not being a person whose business it is and -was at that time to deal in drugs and medicines), did not close at the hour of nine…
2Cited by3 opinions
- People v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. BohmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894