People v. James
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Marquette. (Stone,' J.) Submitted on briefs April 25, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Eespondent was convicted of keeping his saloon open after hours. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Respondent was convicted of keeping open his saloon after the hour of 11 o’clock in the evening.
The people’s testimony showed that the respondent kept a saloon where spirituous and malt liquors were sold. A policeman and the marshal and deputy marshal testified that on the evening charged, between 11 and 12 o’clock, they passed the place, and heard voices in the saloon, from which they judged that four or five persons were in there, and they heard the glasses rattling. The respondent’s case is stated in the record as follows:
“ The testimony of the defendant, taken at his request on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Kurtz v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. WaldvogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Rode v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907