Legal Opinion
Louis R. Matthews v. USP MCCREARY, et al.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided February 4, 2026No. 6:24-cv-00062Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON LOUIS R. MATTHEWS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 6:24-CV-62-REW ) v. ) ) USP MCCREARY, et al., ) AMENDED ORDER (AMENDING DE 39) ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff Louis R. Matthews’s Amended Complaint. See DE 35 (Motion to Dismiss). Matthews responded in opposition, see DE 37 (Response), and Defendants replied. See DE 38 (Reply). Thus, the matter is ripe for decision. For the reasons outlined below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 35). I.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.