Legal Opinion

Pavey v. Utter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

On the 6th day of August, 1889, the Commission of Claims appointed Henry M. Utter bailiff, the appointment being made without the consent or approval of the Auditor. Subsequent to the appointment, Utter presented' to the Auditor a certificate from the president of the Commission of Claims, certifying that he had served as bailiff eight days, and upon the presentation of the certificate he demanded that the Auditor issue a warrant for $24, payable out of the State treasury. The Auditor refused, and this petition for mandamus was brought to compel the Auditor to issue his warrant for $24, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Devine v. Board of CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Kepley v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Goodall v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ettelson v. FahertyIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Shinners v. Royal Coal & Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. McKee v. TrislerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API