Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Ettelson v. Faherty

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1922No. 15077PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

By leave of court Samuel A. Ettelson, corporation counsel for the city of Chicago, was granted permission to file an original petition in this court for a writ of mandamus against Michael J. Faherty and others, composing the board of local improvements of the city of Chicago. The petition alleges that Ettelson is the corporation counsel of the city of Chicago and a citizen and tax-payer in said city; that it is his duty to have- charge of and attend to all the legal business of all the departments of the city of Chicago; that he maintains an office in said city, with numerous assistants and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hope v. City of AltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People ex rel. Dougherty v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Soby v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Chicago v. LordIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pavey v. UtterIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Miller v. HotzIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. La Parr v. City of RockfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Gray v. W. A. Black Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People Ex Rel. Cromer v. Village of MaywoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Harvard v. McCauleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API