Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 11, 2014No. 2013-5117PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm.
Background
In a March 2011 memorandum to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy explained that the Navy would be “challenged to reduce enlisted manning to meet future planned end strength controls due to record high retention in the current economic environment.” J.A. 1000. To address these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- John C. Boyle, Paintiff-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Stuart Sargisson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Baude v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Rotech Healthcare, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Beck v. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Crumley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Hickman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.