Kalico, Inc. v. Dooley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This appeal is “from that part of the order of the trial court made on February 15, 1961, upon plaintiff’s motion to tax costs denying to defendants a reasonable attorney’s fee under the provisions of Section 4207 of the Government Code. ’' 1
A résumé of some of the facts is as follows: Peder C. Boddum entered into a public work general contract with Cerritos Junior College School District for certain site preparation work. Boddum entered into a subcontract with Dooley Bros, for delivery of fill materials to the site. Thereafter plaintiff agreed with Dooley Bros, to provide fill materials from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Granite Rock Co. v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977