Legal Opinion

Dolgoff v. Kaynar Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 20, 1955No. 16195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

Plaintiif seeks damages and injunctive relief for alleged infringement by defendant of United States Letters Patent No. 2,210,802, and more particularly claim 4 thereof which reads as follows:

“4. A hair holder formed in a manner to comprise a hair entering portion, a head piece comprising a plurality of arm like extensions, said arm like extensions being of a length to correspond to the design of the portion of hair to be set and including a hair gripping portion whereby the hair may be held in place in accordance with said design by inserting the hair entering portion…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
  2. Delco Chemicals, Inc. v. Cee-Bee Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
  3. Barofsky v. General Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1966
  4. Otto v. Koppers Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API