Legal Opinion

Francis Gaffney v. Norman Silk

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 27, 1973No. 73-1242PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McENTEE, Circuit Judge.

This action, commenced under 42 U.S. C. § 1983 (1970), seeks to recover damages from the defendant selectmen of the Town of Randolph, Massachusetts, for alleged deprivations of plaintiffs’ procedural due process rights. Plaintiffs are two former Randolph policemen who became physically disabled during the performance of their duties, and who, pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 41, § 111F (1968) had been receiving “regular pay” benefits. On September 13, 1971, the defendants voted to immediately terminate payment of these benefits to plaintiffs, without providing them…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Joseph M. Schultea, Sr. v. David Robert Wood, David Robert Wood, Homer Ford, W.F. "Slim" Plagens and Warren K. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Kadar Corp. v. Mary H. MilburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  4. Troy Lee Douthit v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas, and W. H. McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Alan S. Kostka v. David W. HoggCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API