Alan S. Kostka v. David W. Hogg
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
The damages action authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is limited in several significant respects: (1) municipalities and other political subdivisions are not subject to suit, see Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961), (2) only persons who were directly involved in the wrongdoing may be held liable, see Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 96 S.Ct. 598, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976), and (3) officials enjoy either an absolute, see, e.g., Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976), or qualified, see, e.g., Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Thomas Turpin v. Joseph MailetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Grandstaff v. City of BorgerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Fred Tarpley, Sr. v. Raymond J. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.