Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Farnsworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1984Published

1DissentGreen, J.

The trial court’s refusal to charge the effect of intoxication on the element of intent denied the defendant a fair trial (Penal Law, § 15.25). A charge on intoxication must be given if there is sufficient evidence of intoxication in the record for a reasonable person to entertain a doubt as to the element of intent on that basis (People v Perry, 61 NY2d 849, 850; see, also, People v Orr, 43 AD2d 836, affd 35 NY2d 829; People v Lee, 35 NY2d 826). The majority concludes that the evidence on intoxication was insufficient to justify the charge as requested by the defendant. I disagree.

On the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. HokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. VictorNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. KoerberNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. People v. Le MieuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API