People v. Le Mieux
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The defendant in this perjury prosecution made a timely written request that the trial court charge the jury as follows : “You are instructed that in a prosecution for perjury the falsity of the alleged statement of defendant that he met Tut Robinson on East Falls Street may not be established by the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness. Before you can convict the defendant it must appear from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the statement of the defendant as to the East Falls Street meeting was false, by the testimony of two witnesses, or…
2Cited by26 opinions
- People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. LiptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. CobosNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MezonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.