Legal Opinion

People v. Le Mieux

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1980PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The defendant in this perjury prosecution made a timely written request that the trial court charge the jury as follows : “You are instructed that in a prosecution for perjury the falsity of the alleged statement of defendant that he met Tut Robinson on East Falls Street may not be established by the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness. Before you can convict the defendant it must appear from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the statement of the defendant as to the East Falls Street meeting was false, by the testimony of two witnesses, or…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. People v. LiptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. CobosNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. MezonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API