Legal Opinion

People v. Perry

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1984PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered. The trial court’s refusal to charge on intoxication denied defendant his right to have the jury properly consider the effect intoxication could have on the element of intent (Penal Law, § 15.25). A charge on intoxication should be given if there is sufficient evidence of intoxication in the record for a reasonable person to entertain a doubt as to the element of intent on that basis (People v Orr, 43 AD2d 836, affd 35 NY2d 829; see, also, People v Lee, 35 NY2d 826). On the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. OrrNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. OrrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. People v. ButtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. GainesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. SiricoNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API