Legal Opinion

State v. Whitley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 8110SC1008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The State’s evidence tended to show that three men participated in the commission of a breaking and entering and larceny; and that after the theft all three went to a home which one of the participants (Watson) shared with his girlfriend (Hawkins). Defendant’s first argument is that the following testimony by Hawkins was inadmissible hearsay:

Watson said that they had broken in a home and that they had parked the car on a road around behind the store. They had to go through the woods. They had broke in the home and that they had to leave because they heard someone coming and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FCX, INC. v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API