Legal Opinion
Everest v. American Transportation Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 20, 1988No. Civ. 4-86-419PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff George S. Everest, the appointed trustee for the heirs and next of kin of decedents Erik Palmer Hanson, Sandra Jo Everest-Hanson, and Baby Hanson, 1 brought this action against General Motors Corporation (GM) and American Transportation Corporation (Am Tran). 2 Plaintiff’s decedents were killed when the motorcycle on which they were riding collided with a school bus, the chassis of which was manufactured by GM and the body of which was manufactured by Ward Industries, Inc. (Ward), the predecessor company of Am Tran.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Clarence Tucker, Jr. And Jean Tucker v. Paxson MacHine Company, William Thropp & Sons Company, Division of J.M.L. Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R.C.M. Executive Gallery Corp. v. Rols Capital Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- T.H.S. Northstar Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993