Tewell, Thorpe & Findlay, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
This appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action challenging the denial of coverage by Continental Casualty Company under a professional liability policy issued to the appellant law firm. Specifically, appellants Tewell, Thorpe & Findlay, Inc., P.S. (Tewell Thorpe) and Richard J. Thorpe appeal the trial court's rulings (1) declining to hold that the disputed language of the policy was ambiguous as a matter of law, and (2) granting respondent Continental Casualty's motion in limine excluding evidence regarding the dismissal of the underlying legal malpractice claim. We affirm the trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Professional Managers, Inc. v. Fawer, Brian, Hardy & ZatzkisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Liebling v. Garden State Indem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Manufacturers & Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- McAllister v. Agora Syndicate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- McAllister v. Agora Syndicate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.