Legal Opinion

International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Manufacturers & Merchants Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 19, 1995No. 94-133PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendants, Manufacturers & Merchants Mutual Insurance Company (MMMIC) and its president, Charles J. Gesen, *17appeal the Superior Court’s (Arnold, J.) ruling that the plaintiff, International Surplus Lines Insurance Company (ISLIC), need not defend and indemnify them under a professional liability policy in suits brought against the defendants by some of MMMIC’s former shareholders. We affirm based on an exclusion in the policy barring coverage for claims arising from “any act, error or omission occurring prior to the effective date of this policy if. . . the insured at the effective date…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Professional Managers, Inc. v. Fawer, Brian, Hardy & ZatzkisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Coakley v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. Phoenix Insurance v. Sukut Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Colony Insurance v. Dover Indoor Climbing GymSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Bates v. Phenix Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Progressive Northern Insurance v. Argonaut InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API