Moran v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Presiding Judge.
Without an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge dismissed his petition for post-conviction relief. He considered it under the Habeas Corpus Act rather than the Post-Conviction Procedure Act. Although T.C.A. § 40-3808 provides that a petition for habeas corpus may be treated as one for post-conviction, there is no provision that a petition for post-conviction may be treated as one for habeas corpus. In this case the result would be the same under either proceeding.
The petition alleges that he was jointly indicted with one William H. Buchanan for armed robbery.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norfleet Sawyer v. Franklin K. Brough, Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Reed v. HeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Favors v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
- Mueller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Swanson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- Corey Lillard v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Marvin Anthony Matthews, pro se v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004