Legal Opinion

Marlow v. School Dist. No. 4, Murray County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1911No. 940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

JJrror from District Court, Murray County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by R. Marlow and others against School District No. 4, Murray County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

A temporary injunction was issued by the county judge of Murray county in the absence from said county of the district judge, enjoining the defendants in error from issuing for said school district bonds in the sum of $10,000. On motion at chambers, the temporary injunction was dissolved. The petition in due form, averring that said bond issue, including existing indebtedness, exceeded in the aggregate 5 per centum of the valuation of the taxable property of said school district, was properly verified. No evidence, by affidavit or otherwise, was offered in support of the motion to dissolve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Hannan v. Bd. of Educ. of City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. Incorporated Town of RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Faught v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Vette v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Town of Afton v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API