Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barker v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1986No. 15445Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice

I

Having sometime ago authored a proposed majority opinion (appendicized) which is much like today’s opinion for the Court, I am able to concur with the majority view that the Commission in its second review of this case committed no error and did correctly apply Spanbauer v. Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co., 93 Idaho 509, 465 P.2d 633 (1970). And, other than for my penchant for delving deeper into prior opinions of this Court and an overly active sense of justice, my earlier proposed majority opinion would have been unanimous, I would have spared myself many days of exhaustive research and the writing…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. England v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API