Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Labor Relations Board v. Tito Contractors, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 3, 2017No. 15-1217; Consolidated with 15-1226Published

1ConcurrenceRogers, Circuit Judge

I concur in granting the petition for review, and denying the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its Order. With respect to the challenge to the Board’s finding of the appropriateness of the company-wide bargaining unit, Op. Part II.B, I concur for the following reasons. The Board’s decision failed to come to grips with record evidence offered by the petitioner that potentially detracts from the conclusion that the company-wide bargaining unit sought by the Union was appropriate. See Tito Contractors, Inc. v. Int’l Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Dist. Council 51 (AFL-CIO), NLRB…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Shepard v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. RC Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Sundor Brands, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API