Legal Opinion

James K. Hardison v. Michael M. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 8, 2004No. 03-13162PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents an issue that has divided courts and commentators alike: whether a comprehensive statutory scheme that provides no remedy for a former employee of a federal agency, who contends that his discharge violated the Constitution, bars the former employee from obtaining any monetary or equitable relief. In deference to Congress, we conclude that the statutory scheme bars a claim for monetary damages, but we acknowledge, without deciding the issue, that a serious question remains whether equitable relief is necessarily precluded. We conclude, however, that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Systems, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Sarah E. Hendrix v. John W. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. American Federation of Government Employees Local 1 v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Lyttle v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API