Legal Opinion

People v. Patrick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2009No. 104077, 104445PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Gar-man, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Burke concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion, joined by Justice Freeman.

OPINION

In these consolidated appeals, we consider whether a trial court may defer ruling on a motion in limine to exclude a defendant’s prior convictions from use as impeachment until after a defendant’s testimony. On appeal, Patrick claimed that the trial court erred in delaying its ruling on his motion in limine and that the jury instructions were erroneous. The appellate court held that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. People v. DelvillarIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. AverettIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BaezIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. CatheyIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. MullinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API