Legal Opinion

People v. Averett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2010No. 106362, 106621 consPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Thomas, Carman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Burke dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Freeman.

OPINION

These consolidated appeals address whether a defendant may be entitled to relief on appeal after choosing not to testify at trial if the trial court had a “blanket policy” of deferring rulings on motions in limine to exclude prior convictions for impeachment until after the defendant testified. Defendant Warren Averett also contends that he should receive a new trial because the trial court failed to respond properly…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  3. People v. CatheyIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. MullinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. BowensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API