Kennedy v. Gloster
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
1874, and for several years prior thereto, the defendant, D. M. Gloster, was the owner of a tract of land, situated partly in Plumas County and partly in Sierra County, in this state, the part in Sierra County being described as the northwest quarter of a certain section 5. He was a married man, and the land was all community property. There was a dwelling-house on the quarter-section in Sierra County, in which he with his wife and children then lived, and has ever since lived. The whole tract was enclosed by a fence, but was subdivided into separate fields, a portion of the land…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beck v. SowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ivey v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Thomas v. SpeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Burbank v. KirbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.