Legal Opinion

Capital Bonding Corp. v. New Jersey Supreme Court

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 30, 2001No. Civil 00-4134(JBS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge:

This case calls upon the Court to decide whether it should abstain from considering the merits of a challenge to the constitutional legitimacy of certain efforts by the New Jersey Court to improve the bail bond process within New Jersey. Plaintiff Capital Bonding Corp., a New Jersey company in the business of insuring bail bondsmen who post bail for criminal defendants in New Jersey, seeks to stay New Jersey Court Rule 1:13 — 3(e) (hereinafter “Rule 1:13-3”, or the “new Rule”) from going into effect.

This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff Capital Bonding…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dobrek v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Dobrek v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. Rush Tp., Penn.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Holland v. RosenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  5. Financial Casualty & Surety Co. v. ThayerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API