Capital Bonding Corp. v. New Jersey Supreme Court
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
This case calls upon the Court to decide whether it should abstain from considering the merits of a challenge to the constitutional legitimacy of certain efforts by the New Jersey Court to improve the bail bond process within New Jersey. Plaintiff Capital Bonding Corp., a New Jersey company in the business of insuring bail bondsmen who post bail for criminal defendants in New Jersey, seeks to stay New Jersey Court Rule 1:13 — 3(e) (hereinafter “Rule 1:13-3”, or the “new Rule”) from going into effect.
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff Capital Bonding…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dobrek v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Dobrek v. PhelanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. Rush Tp., Penn.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Holland v. RosenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Financial Casualty & Surety Co. v. ThayerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.