F. C. Austin Mfg. Co. v. Twin Brooks Tp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Grant county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action by the F. C. Austin Manufacturing Company against Twin Brooks township, Grant county to recover the value of a road machine. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the value of a certain road machine designated as the “Austin Reversible Steel Road lilachine.” Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
On May 4, 1896, T. A. Falls and L. Cunningham, two of the supervisors of the township of Twin Brooks, ordered of the plaintiff the machine in controversy, to be shipped to said Falls, at Twin Brooks, at the specified price of $265. On May 29th the machine was received by the said Falls, and, upon the trial of the same, said Falls and Cunningham, as trustees, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Salt Creek Township v. King Iron Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- School District No. 7 v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Dively v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Goodnow v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Detman TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Huston v. Sioux Falls TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903