Legal Opinion
Kash v. Honey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 11, 2002No. Docket No. 01-7794PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of said district court, entered on February 21, 2001, be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Plaintiffs Harvey Kash, Carl Lanzisera, and Julia Gambino appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Thomas G. Platt, Judge) granting summary judgment to defendants A. Craig Purcell and Edward Manzello.
The plaintiffs belong to Americans for Legal Reform (“ALR”), an organization that “seeks to bring about reform in the American legal system through political…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harrison v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Young v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Rankel v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Young v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Polidi v. BannonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.