Polidi v. Bannon
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge
The matter is before the Court on the pro se plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because plaintiff has made the requisite showing, his application to proceed in forma pauperis must be granted.
Importantly, however, § 1915(e) requires that a complaint filed in forma pau-peris be dismissed if at any time it is determined that the action “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- ALLEN v. ELWELLDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Cook v. USAA Federal Savings, BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Cook v. USAA Federal Savings, BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Davidson III v. USAA General Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- Dorothea B. Perkins v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.