Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2001No. 2001-0929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 324.] THE STATE EX REL. SHEMO, TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.,

2001-Ohio-203.] Mandamus sought to compel city of Mayfield Heights et al. to approve relators’ application for road improvement plans—Motion for expedited consideration granted—Motion for peremptory writ denied and cause dismissed without prejudice. (No. 01-929—Submitted May 30, 2001—Decided July 18, 2001.) IN MANDAMUS. ON MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION. __________________ {¶ 1} On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Shemo v. Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Nix v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Hackworth v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Committee for the Charter Amendment for an Elected Law Director v. City of Bay VillageOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Howard v. PlankOhio Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API