Legal Opinion

Stieffel v. Tolhurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Charles H. Tolhurst and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New . York on the 22d day of July, 1901, upon the decision of the court, ' rendered after a trial at the Yew York Special Term, sustaining the plaintiffs’ demurrers to certain defenses contained in the answers ofothe defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This action was brought to recover the rent due under a certain lease made by the plaintiffs to a corporation originally incorporated as L. J. Wing & Company, and now known as the Manhattan Machinery Company. The complaint alleges that on the 5th day of March, 1891, the plaintiffs rented to this corporation certain • premises known as Yo. 109 Liberty street, in the city of Yew York, for a term of five years from May 1, 1891, to May 1, 1899, the rent for the first four years to be $5,000 per annum and for the last year to be $5,500, payable in equal monthly payments in advance;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Close v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Allen v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Von StorchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Washington Securities Co. v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Lankford, State Bank Com'r. v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API