Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lankford, State Bank Com'r. v. Menefee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1914No. 3330Published

Error from District Court, Caddo County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by J. D. Lankford, State Bank Commissioner, against J. A. Menefee. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1DissentBiddle, J.

I am unable to agree with the reasoning and conclusion in the opinion upon rehearing of the majority of the court. Owing to the importance of -the question involved, as affecting both the state and the defendant,' as well as marking the beginning of what I deem a new policy affecting corporations generally, especially the basic principles of the bank guaranty law, I deem it my duty to set forth my views in detail.

In preparing the original opinion I examined the authorities cited by both parties, and made an independent investigation of ttnany others, and reached a conclusion which I believed…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API