Legal Opinion

People v. Madden

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1901No. Sac. No. 837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion in this case and in the opinion rendered in People v. Madden, 133 Cal. 347.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

In the above-entitled case—which was a suit brought in the name of the people of the state against the defendant Madden, as treasurer of Modoc County, and his sure-, ties,—judgment was entered on the motion of John McGahey, intervener, and now respondent, against the plaintiff, for the dismissal of the action, and against John E. Raker, the appellant,—who was plaintiff’s attorney, and not otherwise connected with the case,—for costs. Appeals were taken by both parties affected, and on the appeal of the plaintiff the judgment was reversed, leaving the appeal of Raker still pending,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dashiell v. SlingerlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Filardi Hermanos v. Arbona FronteraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941
  3. Hermanos v. Arbona FronteraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API