Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Drinkwater
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1935No. Civil No. 3639PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
— City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation hereinafter called defendant, has appealed from a judgment in favor of O. P. Drinkwater, hereinafter called plaintiff, upon two claims for wages due from defendant to Jim Garcia and Jesus Salazar, and assigned by them to plaintiff.
The questions before us are of law only, as the case was heard npon an agreed statement of facts which is in substance as follows: Garcia had been employed by defendant in its street railway department as a common laborer from the 15th of April, 1933, to the 23d of May, 1934. During all of this time chapter 12 of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pollard v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Fourth Nat. Bank of NY v. FrancklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Larsen v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Long v. OdellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Wise v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.