Legal Opinion

Faulkner Advertising Associates, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1990No. 89-1548PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Chief Judge:

Faulkner Advertising Associates, Inc. (“Faulkner”) brought this action against Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (“Nissan”), alleging that Nissan was engaged in an illegal “tying” arrangement in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. The district court granted Nissan’s motion to dismiss this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because of Faulkner’s failure to state a *771claim upon which relief could be granted. In particular, the district court held that Faulkner had failed to allege in its complaint all of the essential elements of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Susan Labram Bart Labram v. James HavelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Boston & Maine Corporation v. Town of HamptonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Crosten v. KamaufDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  5. Vasconcellos v. Cybex International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API