Legal Opinion

Steen v. Murray

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 28, 2013No. Case No. 8:13CV43PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Filing No. 41) filed by Defendants Robert Murray (“Murray”), Ryan Boe (“Boe”), and Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP (“Lamson Dugan”) (collectively “Defendants”). Also before the Court is the Mo*1032tion to Retransfer Case or Retain Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Filing No. 47), filed by the Plaintiffs Richard “Bud” Steen and Lloydene Steen (collectively “Plaintiffs” or the “Steens”). The parties have submitted briefs (Filing Nos. 42, 46, 48, 49, 50, and 51) in support of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FALONI & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. CITIBANK, N.A.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API