In re D.B.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The juvenile, D.B., appeals the Manchester Family Division’s (Emery, J.) finding of delinquency based upon a petition alleging misdemeanor sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:4, I (Supp. 2011). He argues that there was insufficient evidence for the trial court to find that he committed sexual assault against the complainant pursuant to the variant charged. See RSA 632-A:2,1(a) (2007). We reverse.
The record supports the following facts. In May 2010, the juvenile and the complainant, also a juvenile, regularly rode the school bus together. On May 19, the juvenile sat next to the complainant on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- State v. NicklesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- In re Nathan L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re N.K.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Petition of the State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019