Legal Opinion
Baltimore & OR Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
This action was brought under 28 U.S. C. §§ 1336, and 2321-2325 providing for actions to enjoin, set aside, annul or suspend in whole or in part orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission. It has been heard before a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2284 and 2321-2325. The complaint prays judgment permanently suspending, enjoining, setting aside and annulling an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated January 15, 1951 and its order of June 22, 1951, modifying the previous order by postponing its effective date. The previous order granted the relief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hilton Hotels International, Inc. v. Junta de Salario MínimoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Great Northern Railway Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
- Paulson v. Schirmer Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- In Re Application of PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad v. Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.