Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion of defendant for a writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

At tbe last Term of this Court, being the first Term of this Court after the trial below, the appellant docketed the record proper and applied for a certiorari as the case had not been settled by the Judge. Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562. By consent the motion was continued to this term. It appears that the ease and counter-case were served in time and that the appellant immediately applied to the Judge to settle the case. The appellant' would be entitled to his certiorari, but as the trial Judge (His Honor Judge Graves) has since died, the Court must order a new trial. State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Nelson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  3. Dennis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Larkey Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ByrnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API